Environment variable issue

[Marc Lehmann]

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:08:23PM +0300, Adrian Sendroiu <molecula2788 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, the environment is being preserved, or would, if there was an
> > environment to preserve. As it is, you expect urxvt to preserve something
> > that it cannot know about (whats the semantics of empty strings?).
> 
> No, I expect to preserve the other ones, which have sane values.

As far as I can see, this is exactly what happens. I am still confused
though - what you seem to report is some expectation of preservation when
you do NOT pass in sane values (or even valid ones) - empty strings have
no meaning in the environment, and thus there is no way to preserve them
in any sense of the word preservation - you can't even represent them in
the environment, so what should the semantic value of empty strings be?

-- 
                The choice of a       Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
      -----==-     _GNU_              http://www.deliantra.net
      ----==-- _       generation
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      Marc Lehmann
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      schmorp at schmorp.de
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\