[PATCH] urxvtd, getopt and mlock

[Russell Harmon]

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 05:14, Marc Lehmann <schmorp at schmorp.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:45:15AM -0500, Russell Harmon <russ at eatnumber1.com> wrote:
>> > in april of last year), so this is definitely worth considering.
>> According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405781, the
>> bug was fixed and backported all the way to glibc-2.5.20. You may not
>> be running the latest bugfix release of glibc-2.7.
>
> There has never been a "2.5-20" release of glibc, glibc doesn't use this
> klind of versioning scheme. This looks like redhat-specific thing, and I
> don't think it makes sense to require usage of redhat?
Hmm... what should I do then? I've been running with a patched urxvtd
for a few weeks now without problems and i'm running Gentoo with
glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1 (so if it is fixed, i've probably got the fix).

>> > And so is --open-display... it's a technical term.
>> However --open-display is at least two real words. And in a technical
>> context, it is more correct than --opendisplay
>
> I disagree?
Ok, i'll take out that change.