Suggestion regarding verbage in Canary::Stability
Marc Lehmann
schmorp at schmorp.de
Wed Mar 9 11:27:23 CET 2016
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:18:06PM +1300, Kent Fredric <kentfredric at gmail.com> wrote:
> There's been a bit of confusion by some people who don't really
> understand why Canary::Stability exists, because they may not have the
> underlying context needed to interpret the messages.
Hmm, what's the nature of the confusion, the exact meaning of the word
"support", or something else?
> Subsequently, this warning is just to let you know that risk is there
> so you can make judgement calls on how to proceed"
Sounds like a good idea (and fortunately easy to implement, thanks to it
being a separate module) - do you think this should be just part of the
"red" text messages, or should it be always included?
Greetings,
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schmorp at schmorp.de
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
More information about the perl
mailing list