Suggestion regarding verbage in Canary::Stability

Marc Lehmann schmorp at schmorp.de
Wed Mar 9 11:27:23 CET 2016


On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:18:06PM +1300, Kent Fredric <kentfredric at gmail.com> wrote:
> There's been a bit of confusion by some people who don't really
> understand why Canary::Stability exists, because they may not have the
> underlying context needed to interpret the messages.

Hmm, what's the nature of the confusion, the exact meaning of the word
"support", or something else?

> Subsequently, this warning is just to let you know that risk is there
> so you can make judgement calls on how to proceed"

Sounds like a good idea (and fortunately easy to implement, thanks to it
being a separate module) - do you think this should be just part of the
"red" text messages, or should it be always included?

Greetings,

-- 
                The choice of a       Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
      -----==-     _GNU_              http://www.deliantra.net
      ----==-- _       generation
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      Marc Lehmann
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      schmorp at schmorp.de
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\



More information about the perl mailing list