SIGCHLD not received

Denis Bilenko denis.bilenko at
Wed Jul 25 10:58:36 CEST 2012

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Marc Lehmann <schmorp at> wrote:
>> in loop_fork() you call
> Hm, right.
> Can you try the CVS version of libev? That one doesn't rely on this check
> anymore, and will probably just work (the test in the signal handler relied
> on int being atomic and was actually a temporary bug workaround, which the
> cvs version should fix)

Yes, it appears to be fixed now.

More information about the libev mailing list