asynchronous socket writing
Marc Lehmann
schmorp at schmorp.de
Thu Mar 11 20:46:44 CET 2010
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 03:54:05PM +0100, "Jonas H." <jonas at lophus.org> wrote:
> What I don't really get is: If libev is event-driven, why won't I get
> other 'accepts' while there's already another transaction going on in
> the background? (I've set both sockets to be nonblocking.) Does this
Whats a transaction?
Keep in mind that you need to do non-blocking I/O (i.e. you must not
block), and of course you actually have to run the event loop (which is
why you must not block :).
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schmorp at schmorp.de
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
More information about the libev
mailing list