[PATCH 2] fix broken strict aliasing

Alejandro Mery amery at geeks.cl
Fri Feb 19 18:26:49 CET 2010


On 19/02/10 18:22, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:12:45PM +0600, "Denis F. Latypoff"<denis at gostats.ru>  wrote:
>>    Just found yet another potentially broken strict aliasing rules in
>>    ev.c
>
> same here, this is at best a nop and at worst a dangerous patch. it has no
> effect on any aliasing issues you might have seen (obviously, as the types
> are still the same).

what's the danger? why do you insist in refusing this?

"at best" they reduce tons of warnings without affecting the code.

what's wrong with the warnings? they add tons of noise that doesn't 
allow us to see clearly other warnings that can be interesting.

Regards,
Alejandro Mery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5215 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.schmorp.de/pipermail/libev/attachments/20100219/db9c42ab/attachment.bin>


More information about the libev mailing list