multi-threading

Tony Arcieri tony at clickcaster.com
Tue Jan 29 19:17:22 CET 2008


On Jan 29, 2008 6:36 AM, Marc Lehmann <schmorp at schmorp.de> wrote:

> It would also avoid any queueing issues by not supporting it, so signaling
> a aignal n times might result in <> the sig_atomic_t member might not be there).
>
> Also, the uer would be responsible to only run ev_async_send on started
> watchers etc. etc.
>
> all that would piggypack nicely on top of the existing signal handling.
>
> feedback from people on this would be nice.
>

That all sounds fine to me.

-- 
Tony Arcieri
ClickCaster, Inc.
tony at clickcaster.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.schmorp.de/pipermail/libev/attachments/20080129/cde9c930/attachment.htm 


More information about the libev mailing list